Merlin
03/08/2018
“Actual data requires interaction and engagement.
Perceived Data relies on past personal experiences(or hear say?)
Relying only on perceived data can not maintain stasis. You will adapt and react to things that may not be Actual which changes you, which can change the Actual.
ie. If you behave as if something is true, you may make it true.
The antidote is Actual Data which is only obtained through interaction.
Confidence in your ability to intuit situations is fine, but hubris will cause you to forget the line between Perceived (Data) and Actual Data.
Interaction is required for Actual Data.
There for we can see that even an ideal scenario or phenomena based on Actual Data still requires interaction and engagement to maintain Purity.
As Actual Data is reduced, Perceived Data will try to take it’s place. As the chart shows, when the percentage of a given situation begins to favor “Perceived Data“, the chances of bad or non-ideal conditions increase while the inverse increases the chances of Ideal Conditions.
In this case “Ideal” refers to the health of the situation, not necessarily that you will like the outcome.
ie. It’s best to engage directly the truth so you can respond to it even if you do not like that truth.
(This Ideal exists) Presuming we consider the ideal case to be clear mindedly understanding a situation so that we can choose based on truth.”
This post was created with our nice and easy submission form. Create your post!
